Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice 

Despite what you probably have heard by now, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is not the worst film ever, nor is it the best. It is a beautiful mess. Visually, this film is stunning in parts, particularly the opening, and we’ve probably been treated to the best on-screen Batman we’ve ever had. But this film is all over the place. Clumsy writing, unclear character motives and strange plot decisions make this film incredibly frustrating.

Full spoilers form hereon.

THE PLOT  

Following directly on from 2013’s Man of Steele, BvS focuses on the fallout from the destruction Metropolis and Superman’s role in this. Turns out Batman (Ben Affleck) (along with many others) is pretty pissed off about this, not least because Superman (Henry Cavill) destroyed a Wayne Enterprises building (and probably killed a good few people in the process). Batman seeks to bring down Superman because, and I’m paraphrasing here, if there’s a 1% chance Superman is their enemy they have to take that as a certainty and take him out. He does this with nudges and encouragement from Jesse Eisenberg’s Lex Luthor along the way who for unknown reasons doesn’t want Superman around. Predictably, our heroes finally realise that they should probably be both on the same team (they have got that Justice League movie coming up) and team up along with Wonder Woman (Gal Gadot) to take down Lex Luthor and his monster, Doomsday. The three combine to bring down the monstrosity with Superman dealing the final blow with the weapon designed by Batman to take down the Man of Steel himself (probably some metaphor there). In doing so however, Superman is stabbed through the chest by Doomsday. This was a genuine shock. Snyder handled the death of Superman excellently and theres a moving sequence at the end of the film giving the hero the send-off he deserves. But not really. He’ll be back for Justice League and also the standalone Superman films DC have promised us.

Tonally, this film is dark and the colours are saturated to make it feel that way. You’ll probably have read that there aren’t any jokes. There are a few, not many, but not everything has to be Marvel right? I’ve also read that this film takes itself too seriously but I don’t think that’s the case. There’s a couple of tongue in cheek moments i.e. when Perry White suggests nobody cares about Clark Kent fighting Batman and a moment later on in the film between Batman and Martha Kent. I don’t think it’s fair to criticise a film based on a lack of jokes when it’s not meant to be funny. Where Marvel has mainly stuck to the same formula for the majority of their films, it feels like Snyder is pushing the boat out here and really taking a bit of a risk. That’s not to say I don’t enjoy Marvel, I do, but that’s not what I want from my Batman, thanks.

THE GOOD

Like I said earlier, despite a mauling by many of the critics, there is a lot to like here.

The opening ten minutes of this film is brilliant. We get a beautifully shot and edited montage of Batman’s origins which is superbly scored by Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL. This film is visually stunning for which you’ve got to give Snyder credit. It’s is very comic book-esque. In fact, some shots are taken directly from comic-book panels, see the example below showing the Dark Knight in Frank Miller’s The Dark Knight Returns from which much of this film is based. This film really feels like a comic brought to life.

Batman. Ben Affleck really delivers. He makes an excellent on screen Batman and Bruce Wayne. In spite of some odd character choices (I’ll get on to that in ‘THE BAD’) and some non-existent detective skills, I think this is the best on-screen Batman we’ve seen. He’s brutal, rage-fueled and bitter – perfect attributes for a man who likes to punch people so hard in the head that their face smashes into the floor (that really does happen). There’s a fight scene in which he takes down a room full of about twenty guys and it’s phenomenal.

Superman. Zack Snyder gets a lot of stick for his treatment of Superman which is a little harsh. Superman, on the whole, is the epitome of good and is a symbol for hope. Snyder’s attempts to make a more complicated character has got him a fair amount of stick but it’s fascinating to see how disillusioned and conflicted Snyder’s Superman is in this early stage in his ‘career’. Just me?

The film also begins to ask important questions about morality too. Should Batman and Superman be able to work outside of government? Is it safe to have someone with the power of Superman accountable to no-one? Does Batman take things too far by kicking the shit out of people and torturing them? Yes he does, that guy has some serious anger issues. The problem is this. These questions are raised early on and then forgotten about when Zack Snyder  decides it’s time to start blowing everything up. Explosions are fun though, right?

I also enjoyed what little we saw of Wonder Woman, she was pretty solid. Amy Adams and Laurence Fishburne were good in their roles as Lois Lane and Perry White respectively. Fishburne actually provides the majority of the levity and humour usually at Clark’s expense. Jeremy Irons’s Alfred is different from what we’ve seen before and that’s a good thing. He’s less of a butler and more of an accomplice to Batman and he’s obviously much more capable than previous on-screen incarnations.

THE BAD

Firstly, this film is a bit of a mess and it feels over-stuffed at times. But my main issue was that there are some strange character motives and plot devices used to move the story forward. The Batman v Superman conflict is really contrived when it didn’t really need to be. Lex Luthor’s plan to pit the two against each other by blowing stuff up and sending some hate-mail to each of them is almost laughable. Even more laughable that the world’s greatest detective would fall for it. And kind of pointless, considering he was spawning Doomsday regardless. It started actually quite promisingly with Lex trying to poison the world against Superman and highlight the Dark Knight’s brutal brand of justice to Clark Kent the journalist. But the writers don’t build on this effectively. Batman’s issues with Superman could have been resolved with a simple conversation and vice versa. Lex Luthor’s plan to pit the heroes against each other is flimsy and it’s not believable that either of them would be this easily manipulated. It feels like the the character’s decisions are there to serve the plot regardless of whether its in keeping with character or not. For example, for almost 2 years Batman fails to do ANY research on Superman, the man he wants to kill. He’s supposed to be a genius detective. Anyone could figure out in 2 minutes that Superman isn’t a bad guy, yet he fails any research so that they can have a bust-up. It’s annoying because there are ways for them to have a genuine, interesting debate, followed by the aforementioned bust-up, if only the writing had been stronger. Saying this, I did really enjoy the Batman v Superman show down when we eventually got to it.

There are also some odd character choices. Batman kills people. A lot of people. With a minigun. There’s also a bit where he sends a car flying through the streets with two gunmen in it. He then attaches it to his car with a grappling hook and rampages through the streets using it as a kind of wrecking ball to flatten another car. With more gunmen in it. That’s got the Bat-fans all riled up. Whilst Batman’s no kill rule is well known, he has killed people in the comics or at leasts he’s left people in mortal peril. That he’s placed them in, in the first place. He’s hardly innocent in the Burton or Nolan films either as pointed out by the excellent Mr Sunday Movies (you should definitely listen to his podcast ‘The Weekly Planet’) in his youtube video below. Apparently Zack Snyder used this as his bible for BvS. Still seems a bit anti-Batman though right? Why doesn’t he just kill The Joker already?!

There is a line of dialogue where Alfred warns Batman that he’s becoming cruel, maybe this blowing people up is a new way of dealing with his anger issues. Anyway, Snyder should probably ease off the killing in future films. This being said, Affleck is still the best on-screen Batman we’ve had.

For my taste, there’s not enough of Batman and Superman being Batman and Superman in the two and a half hours. The first time we get to see either of them in action (barring the murder car chase scene discussed above and a brief montage of Superman carrying the helpless to safety) is way too late in the film. The two should meet sooner and interact more frequently. This could be an interesting moral and character conflict. This is touched on in an early scene but is never really revisited until they start kicking the shit out of each other. Their conflict should also be resolved sooner to allow more development time to the Doomsday plot. That whole plot thread feels so rushed as if it’s just been tagged on at the end of the film. This is probably because it was. The vast majority of it is CGI added in post-production.

The Justice League tie-ins were clumsy and shoehorned into an already over-stuffed film which neither served the plot of this film or effectively gave us an effective introduction to the characters for the lay person. There’s also some odd dream sequences, which I’m going to write another article on, which again don’t really serve the plot. Although again, they are cool and have great visuals. It took me two viewings with prior comic-book intel to figure out what they might mean for the DC universe.

THE VERDICT

I really wanted to like this film, and I did. Just about. I didn’t love it, though. After a three year wait, it came as a disappointment. As a huge batman fan I was excited to see what Ben Affleck did with the character, and his performance was the best thing about this film. Zack Snyder had a tough task here no question about it. He had to address the backlash of what happened in MoS and provide us with a superman sequel. He had to introduce a new Batman and one who was faced with plenty of backlash when he was cast. He had to introduce us to Wonder Woman and set-up the justice league. Did he pass? Just about.

★★★☆☆

AVERAGE. But definitely worth a watch. It’s likely to be very divisive. But for me, the good outweighs the bad – and there is a lot of good here. It’s just a shame that some lazy writing somewhat soured the experience. 

Please feel free to comment below if I’m wrong and you think I’m an idiot or even if you want to agree with me.

Also please follow my twitter account (@RobJ_Hall ), where I’ll be posting all our updates.

Advertisements

10 thoughts on “Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice 

  1. Maybe it’s just a little bit more batman experience, but for me the ‘Knightmare’ sequence was the best part of the film. It’s a perfect indication of Batman’s motives for distrusting Superman. It gives a lot more weight to the 1% chance argument, the stakes were too high to leave any doubt.
    I also think the motives were actually clear and they made a lot of sense to me. It wasn’t a case of Lex manipulating the two of them into fighting, he just nudged them a little, but Batman had already decided he wanted to punch a god long before he saw the explosion or the hate mail. Actually I thought it was incredible that on the surface, Batman and Lex seemed to have the same motives. It was only after digging deeper that we see how unhinged Lex is and the selfish reasons behind his hatred of the man of steel. The reason batman ‘fell’ for the stigma Lex put on Superman isn’t due to Batman being dumb for the sake of plot. To me it seems that he saw the same thing Lex did, an alien threat with an unknown objective. All Lex’s poking and prodding was essentially redundant due to the fact that the character clearly believes he is smarter than everyone and therefore believed he was in control of both the public’s and Batman’s reactions to the man of steel. The main reason he failed in that regard was because despite agitating him a little before the fight, Lex never really had any sway over the Bat.
    All this is just my opinion, but I did love the film. After all the marvel films with very simple plots and characters it was refreshing to see a superhero film that does take itself seriously, I liked how it actually encouraged the audience to have to think about the characters and the choices they made instead of having an hour’s set up for very simple character motivations.
    That being said, I have no delusions about the film being perfect, though I loved Jesse Eisenberg’s performance, the character of Lex seemed fairly inconsequential other than a catalyst for bringing in Doomsday. I agree with you that the film did come across a bit anti-Batman but that seemed like a sacrifice that probably had to be made as it is at heart still a Superman film.
    Long comment, I know, I have a lot to say about this film, if you made it to this point thanks for reading.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Thanks for your comment! I agree with you for the most part by still feel a lot of character decisions were here solely to serve the plot development and not character.
      Yeah I enjoyed the knightmare sequence a lot more second time around and it’s certainly a cool segment for those of us who read comics. But still? Murdering someone over a dream is a bit of a stretch. Regarding Lex manipulating the situation – it is really flimsy and redundant. None of his actions have any payoff. There’s no point of it in the film if it doesn’t affect the plot. It makes both of them look a bit stupid. Batman is a genius right. He’s also fundamentally against killing. Sure in the comics he has a fail safe way of taking down every single other member of this justice league. But it’s exactly that. Just incase. In no Batman that I’ve ever read has he blindly gone into a fight to murder them. So while it makes sense that batman wants the kryptonite, it doesn’t really hold together that what makes him use it is some notes and the killings that lex frames superman for. Which anyone with half a brain could tell superman wasn’t involved in. He could have just talked to him. It was lazy writing in my opinion and it betrayed the character of batman a little. That being said I did enjoy it a lot more second time around.
      I can’t remember if I put this in the review or not but I really liked that Snyder took some risks with the film in contrast to how marvel usually keep the same formula (usually big things falling into the earth) and I liked the seriousness too.
      I wasn’t convinced by Eisenberg’s performance too caricature for me. Wish he’d done what he did in the social network.

      Like

  2. Pingback: Mum asks…Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice | Reel Film

    • Thanks very much! I appreciate Snyder and co taking some risks that other films of the genre don’t usually do but unfortunately not a lot of them paid off! Mainly due to lazy writing in my opinion which makes it very frustrating. I’m interested to see how it stands the test of time, I preferred it much more on second viewing.

      Like

  3. Pingback: New Suicide Squad Trailer! | Reel Film

  4. Pingback: Batfleck Rising | Reel Film

  5. Pingback: 5 Reasons you should still go and see Batman v Superman | Reel Film

  6. Pingback: Weekly Roundup #4 (26th June 2016) | Reel Film

  7. Pingback: Why it’s time to get excited for Suicide Squad | Reel Film

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s